Відео

Anyway to get this actual worksheet/ breakdown. I wrote what I could from the lecture, but feel like im missing things. Thanks x3

What may seem to be reasonable to a government officials maybe a terrible violation to the citizens and therefore unreasonable ! Only a jury of one's peers can decide that question ! Government judges will always be bias to the police officials ! Big problem in US is judges signing warrants that have weak , or false information of a probably cause and leading to constitutional civil rights to be violated ! Everything hangs on that word what's " reasonable " .

RAS, Reasonable Suspicion OF A CRIME that was, is, or will be commtted. not just a hunch. Not just PD police to ID because you "got a call"

He's mistaken about searching a car just for a valid stop. A cop cannot search a car just because they stopped them for spreding or a failed light. Any evidence found in that kinds of search, not seen from plain view, will be thrown out.

How can a cop run into a home without a warrant to look for the knife? There is no exigent circumstances. So he would violate the castle doctrine

She’s very green, but she’s very articulate. If this was in 2013 she’s probably finding her her footing at this point now.

In 95’ I took the LSAT Examination after receiving my B.A. . I did pretty well not well enough to get into Harvard or Yale or Columbia but I could’ve been accepted to some decent schools. I’ve had a great career, but I often wish I would pursued law like my father did.

A good old Irish name O shay 😂

"Mister Bader" is crazy

Link(s) to google classroom you mention?

Greetings

Thanks for the trigger warning

I didn't think you could be asked about your religion. I believe in God but that should not be the concern of the attorney

Its funny i keep watch videos about what exactly probable cause is and No one can explain. I feel like basically cops can get a search warrant for a house just off of reasonable suspicion

Macaulay Culkin* Home Alone. Thank you so much for this video, it's extremely informative

When you are deposed be ready to be crucified ! They will insult you, badger you and insult you--remember they have tons of notes and you have to try to remember everything! Beware! They will ask you over and over again and nit pick you till you are ready to crack- object to form, you may answer, object to form, you may answer, object to form, you may answer,

What does communism allow ? Because this video is about our constitution . But at last word , the Chinese communist party owns this country now . The attempt to oust TIC TOC , hasn’t goen through yet . Chuck Schumer hasn’t brought a bill of that sort to the senit floor yet .

One lie after another.....the whole system is based on race....😂😂...you made me laugh

What if a person calls for help in a mental health crisis and they allow police in, tell them they are not armed, others tell them they are not armed, they immediately handcuff the person who called for help,commence the Pat down and find an “indistinguishable”object in their pocket (a can of dip),remove it from their pocket and then ask the person while handcuffed for consent to open the container? Consent given under duress in a mental health crisis, and while obviously detained in cuffs, there were drugs in the container and the person was then arrested. Is that a violation? This is a case happening in my county court. I’m very curious. Seems like a violation to me. But I’m not a lawyer

I'm grateful for this. Very educative for me as a young lawyer.

Extreme cringe.

Oh look the racist piece of crap.

Thanks for opening the door as I have cross examination coming up for wrongful termination after 23.5 years as the trailer moved off the shipping dock driver didn't put on park but instead of going after the company they fired me

Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine: A rule under which evidence that is the direct result of illegal conduct on the part of an official is inadmissible in a criminal trial against the victim of the conduct.

police officers are azz holes how much justice can you afford

Ah, the theatrics of opening speeches. Waste of the court's time. The USA no doubt does theatrics more than in England. I don't live in Scotland but I prefer their system: jury sworn, then straight to examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witnesses. Save the lawyers' singing and dancing till closing when all evidence has been heard.

WHY SO SERIOUS

Its an art and a scuence. Once you get in the zone...

Proud of my big brother showcasing like a bamf! Get it, CP!

The lawyers and the police do not have to have probable cause. But we do.

This guy nails it dead cold.

Shoes over a power line does not mean drugs are sold there. I know what it means. But that’s not it

i was assigned this video and it was such a nice surprise. it’s informative and engaging. and you have pleasant voice. thank you!

Despite the fact that I hear well, this video is very difficult to hear

Police officers are not trained to ask. They are trained to lie.

Reasonable and probable cause without a warrant???? How?

Giving a description that gives a description that I can visualize he keeps your attention.

I’m ready to go to war now for my class thanks

Equity does not aid a volunteer.

You are my master sir

The professor is advised to engage in a long term fat loss program. It is distracting to watch his hand inside his pants constantly adjusting his falling waist belt

One question do you know why California restrict information about any case in public so the people can see another all cases the people resolving and unresolved cases cases on road of court why California laws covering And restrict elk that info free could’ve corruption reputation about corruption do you know why 🫵🏻? ?

He gets straight to the point - thank you for saving my time

I just wanted to say thank you for helping me navigate the law sharing your videos. Very informative, straight forward, and respectful. I admired your style.

I know my rights but they always try and take them away...for obvious reasons.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 101 - SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS What are “SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS”? TO: All County Sheriffs and All U.S. Marshals FROM: cc: All Federal and State Elected and Appointed Servants RE: Your Duty to Know and Enforce the Law Many court decisions are made by judges. These are called “SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS”. These are un-constitutional. Most People in jail are there without a trial by jury; that is to say, without “DUE PROCESS”. People are losing their homes, life’s savings and other property without due process. Courts serve corporations and the BAR; not the People. Sheriffs and Marshals are derelict of their DUTY because of ignorance of their DUTY. Many educated, sometimes frustrated, misguided people are imprisoned for contempt of court; and, labeled as sovereign citizens, a/k/a terrorists; a ploy of the controlling powers to destroy the sovereignty of “We the People”; all because We the People challenge unconstitutional court practices. Unfortunately, our elected Constitutional Officers, a/k/a Sheriffs and Marshalls, are ignorant of the Constitution, a/k/a the “LAW OF THE LAND”; and, thereby participate in these crimes when they jail the People. If we are going to save the Constitution for the United States of America, it is imperative that Sheriffs, Marshals and the People educate themselves. SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS: [Black’s 4th] “Any proceeding by which a controversy is settled, case disposed of, or trial conducted, in a prompt and simple manner, WITHOUT THE AID OF A JURY, WITHOUT INDICTMENT, or in other respects OUT OF THE REGULAR COURSE OF THE COMMON LAW. In procedure, proceedings are said to be summary ‘when they are short and simple in comparison with regular proceedings’.” Phillips v. Phillips, 8 N.J.L. 122. CONSTITUTIONS MUST BE CONSTRUED TO REFERENCE THE COMMON LAW. SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS ARE NULL AND VOID: “As to the construction, with reference to Common Law, AN IMPORTANT CANON OF CONSTRUCTION IS THAT CONSTITUTIONS MUST BE CONSTRUED TO REFERENCE TO THE COMMON LAW.” The Common Law so permitted destruction of the abatement of nuisances [pains] by summary proceedings; and, it was never supposed that a constitutional provision was intended to interfere with this established principle [even] though there is no common law of the United States in a sense of a national customary law as distinguished from the common law of England adopted in the several states. In interpreting the Federal Constitution, RECOURSE MAY STILL BE HAD TO THE AID OF THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND. It has been said that WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE COMMON LAW, THE LANGUAGE OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION COULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD.” 16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 114: “DUE COURSE OF LAW”: This phrase is synonymous with “DUE PROCESS OF LAW” or “LAW OF THE LAND” and means law in its regular course of administration through courts of justice. Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. Dunmeyer 19 KA 542. Property Seizure requires: FIRST: A trial by jury with sworn Affidavits from an injured party; NOT summary proceedings. SECOND: A Warrant with a wet-ink signature of a Judge; NOT a stamp or clerk’s signature. THIRD: A sworn Affidavit by an injured party and/or witness to a crime. Without these THREE (3) steps, property cannot be legally seized; and, when the Sheriff or Marshal executes a Warrant without ALL of the aforementioned prerequisites, the Sheriff or Marshal becomes liable; and, a conspirator in a crime. “AMENDMENT V of the Constitution of the United States provides: ‘No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property without DUE PROCESS OF LAW.’ A similar provision exists in all the state constitutions; the phrases ‘DUE COURSE OF LAW’ and the ‘LAW OF THE LAND’ are sometimes used; but, all three (3) of these phrases have the same meaning; and, that applies conformity with the ancient and customary laws of the English people or laws indicated by parliament.” Davidson v. New Orleans 96 U.S. 97, 24, L Ed 616. “...no man shall be deprived of his property without being heard in his own defense.” Kinney v. Beverly, 2 Hen. & M (VA). AMENDMENT IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and, NO WARRANTS SHALL ISSUE BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE, SUPPORTED BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION; and, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or THINGS TO BE SEIZED.

A funny thing most Americans don't comprehend and realize law enforcement exist nowhere in the constitution of the united states of America supreme law of the land,the constitution gives them no legal lawful authority or jurisdiction over any American citizen in the united states of America. And the states, justice department, and congress have forgotten four beautiful words (((CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED.)))

And there is no consent under the 4th amendment and constitution of the united states of America supreme law of the land. All rights are inalienable rights no citizens can legally lawfully wave their constitutionally protected rights (liberties, privileges, immunities). Inalienable Cannot be taken away from or given away by the possessor.

Legally under the 4th amendment warrant clause law enforcement should not be even asking any American citizen for a license,ID, insurance, registration without a legal lawful search warrant signed by a judge under oath and affirmation the 4th amendment warrant clause protects Americans papers from illegal searches and seizures as well. The justice department (courts) and law enforcement have been operating illegally unconstitutionally for the past 100 years.

All evidence obtained illegally unconstitutionally is inadmissible in a court of law under exclusionary rule and fruit of the poisonous tree.